table of contents

02/15/2024

Mindfulness in a Distracted World with Nate Klemp

A conversation with Nate Klemp, a philosopher, writer, and founding partner at Mindfulness Magazine, on practicing mindfulness in our fast-paced, technology-dependent world. He is also co-author of the New York Times bestseller “Start Here.” Songs in this episode: “Nausicaa” by Glass Wave and “Dayvan Cowboy” by Boards of Canada.

download transcript [vtt]
00:00:00.000
[MUSIC]
00:00:05.360
This is KZSU Stanford.
00:00:08.640
Welcome to entitled opinions.
00:00:10.760
My name is Robert Harrison and we're coming to you from the Stanford campus.
00:00:14.600
[MUSIC]
00:00:17.240
Our guest today is Nate Klem, co-author of the New York Times Best Selling Book Start Here.
00:00:23.400
He joins me to discuss a topic I've broached often on this show.
00:00:29.520
Namely, how to take one's distance from a hyperconnected world and
00:00:34.840
find one's way back to that inner place of reflective silence within the self.
00:00:40.000
[MUSIC]
00:00:41.840
He addresses this topic in his brand new book called Open Living with an expansive mind in a distracted world.
00:00:48.560
But before I welcome Nate Klem to entitled opinions,
00:00:53.600
let's hear from one of this radio programs, venerable trustees.
00:00:58.640
I mean Edgar Allan Poe, who wrote a poem called Alone,
00:01:03.320
which opens with the following verses.
00:01:06.440
From childhood's hour I have not been, as others were,
00:01:13.160
I have not seen as others saw.
00:01:16.240
I could not bring my passions from a common spring.
00:01:19.600
From the same source I have not taken my sorrow.
00:01:25.200
I could not awaken my heart to joy at the same tone and all I loved, I loved alone.
00:01:31.800
From this uncommon spring deep within the self, everything essential.
00:01:40.240
Everything personal, as well as interpersonal, comes forth into the world we share in common.
00:01:46.120
Without the uncommon differences that separate one person from another,
00:01:52.840
the world that comes between men, as Hannah Arand called it,
00:01:57.600
would not have plurality as one of its basic constituents.
00:02:02.080
If the world is defined by plurality, it's because each one of us, and each one of the citizens,
00:02:11.000
in our polities, has an idiosyncratic first person singular.
00:02:18.120
I say idiosyncratic because a subterranean place of ecstatic interiority hides in every one of us,
00:02:24.560
whether we're aware of it or not.
00:02:26.680
That place remains the self's native homeland,
00:02:31.720
even though most of us abandon or flee from it,
00:02:34.880
for reasons that remain mysterious.
00:02:38.040
DH Lawrence puts it memorably in a passage from his work Phoenix, like quote.
00:02:46.120
In the very darkest continent of the body, there is a God.
00:02:50.600
And from him, issue the first dark rays of our feeling,
00:02:55.880
wordless and utterly previous to words.
00:02:59.800
The innermost rays, the first messengers,
00:03:03.480
the primeval honorable beasts of our being,
00:03:07.200
whose voice echoes wordless and forever wordless down the darkest avenues of the soul,
00:03:14.680
but full of potent speech, our own inner meaning.
00:03:19.960
The God who haunts this dark continent is not one of the traditional divinities,
00:03:28.040
like Yahweh, Zeus, or Jesus.
00:03:31.320
Give us God's before these Lawrence declares.
00:03:36.040
The before God, see, as in mind, are utterly previous to words.
00:03:41.560
There are the first messengers, whose messages reach you,
00:03:46.120
only when the self is alone enough to bring its full attention to bear
00:03:50.520
on that almost inaudible voice, which Lawrence says,
00:03:54.280
is wordless but full of potent speech.
00:03:57.720
In his poem, thought Lawrence evokes the kind of thinking that allows those innermost rays to shine.
00:04:06.200
I've quoted these verses before on entitled opinions.
00:04:11.160
Thought is the welling up of unknown life into consciousness.
00:04:15.560
Thought is a man in his wholeness, holy attending.
00:04:19.960
My guest and I share the opinion that our digital age has declared all out war
00:04:28.760
on the dark continent of inwardness and attention,
00:04:31.960
on the self in his wholeness, holy attending.
00:04:38.360
The devices that so enthrall us and that have compressed the world into a miniature screen
00:04:44.920
are hostile to what Plato called the silent dialogue I have with myself inside my own head.
00:04:52.200
That silent dialogue is what thought is all about.
00:04:56.120
Let's find out if my guest today agrees with that Nate Clamp, welcome to the program.
00:05:01.160
Robert, thank you so much for having me.
00:05:03.960
I have to say that was probably the most beautiful warm up to a podcast.
00:05:09.320
I've heard instead of starting with an ad for
00:05:12.280
Target or Costco, starting with that girl and Poe on our rent,
00:05:17.240
I think we need more of that.
00:05:19.240
So thank you.
00:05:20.120
I feel like I just dropped into a totally different
00:05:23.160
plane of thought and discourse.
00:05:26.680
Well, that's what entitled opinions aims to be.
00:05:30.440
First thing, we don't have any sponsors, so we're not beholden to anyone.
00:05:34.360
We don't make any money. We don't ask for any money.
00:05:36.840
We're down in what I often call the catacombs of Pazy DSU,
00:05:42.280
where we practice this persecuted religion of thinking.
00:05:45.800
There you go.
00:05:48.040
Nate, I mentioned your new book.
00:05:50.600
It's titled open living with an expansive mind in a distracted world.
00:05:55.800
And that book has two parts.
00:05:58.440
In the first part, you describe what a closed mind is
00:06:03.160
and how a closed mind is entangled with,
00:06:05.800
I'll call it self-exile, screen addiction, and political polarization.
00:06:12.600
In the second part, you discuss how to move from a closed to an open or expansive mind.
00:06:18.600
And here you touch on various kinds of openings, different kinds of openings.
00:06:24.200
The psychedelic opening, for example, is you call it opening to the enemy,
00:06:29.880
open meditation and street opening to mention a few rubrics of part two.
00:06:34.280
So let's start with the closed mind.
00:06:36.200
Bear with me here a moment. By your own admission, you were once a screen addict yourself
00:06:42.360
before you made a concerted effort to overcome that addiction.
00:06:45.560
You mentioned that at one point, you imagined your late grandmother, Hilda,
00:06:51.240
who grew up on a rural farm in North Carolina,
00:06:54.200
shadowing you throughout the day.
00:06:57.080
And you write, I quote you, she would be so confused, she would surely wonder,
00:07:02.120
why aren't you going outside?
00:07:04.360
Why aren't you talking to other people?
00:07:06.520
Why do you keep staring into that screen?
00:07:08.920
Hilda, of course, would be right. We're dealing here, which, well,
00:07:15.000
I think it's a major pathology of the 21st century.
00:07:17.960
You cite some statistics that come from global newswire that I'd like to share with our audience
00:07:25.000
from the beginning of your book, which I found rather alarming.
00:07:29.480
I'm going to read here about screen addiction.
00:07:32.680
11 hours, that's the amount of time Nielsen found that the average American adult spends on
00:07:39.080
electronic devices each day.
00:07:41.640
150 daily phone pickups. That was the 2013 figure reported by venture firm,
00:07:50.600
Kleiner Perkins. That is, until a more recent study of smartphone usage found that the average
00:07:56.920
users taps, types, swipes or clicks their device 2,600 times a day.
00:08:04.120
96%. That's the percentage of people who check their device within an hour of waking,
00:08:11.720
according to a study conducted by Deloitte Consulting.
00:08:14.680
They found that 61% of people check their device within five minutes of waking.
00:08:20.120
"Half of all teenagers, this is how many adolescents openly describe themselves as having a
00:08:27.480
significant addiction to their phone when finally 10%. That's the percentage of American adults who
00:08:34.600
admit to having used their smartphone while showering or having sex. This is truly insane."
00:08:42.920
So, question. Why are so many of us addicted to our screens and how difficult is it from your
00:08:49.720
experience to recover from this fixation?
00:08:51.800
Well, I love that you cited all those statistics because I think it presents a context here
00:08:59.880
where sometimes we can argue, "Well, this isn't such a big deal. Everybody looks at their phone.
00:09:05.640
What's wrong with that?" But I think those statistics are helpful in telling us,
00:09:10.120
"No, there's something going on here that we need to pay attention to."
00:09:13.800
And you mentioned my own screen addiction. In a way, it was surprising for me because
00:09:19.480
I felt like on some level I had been training my mind for the last 25 or so years
00:09:26.200
to have focus, to not fall into these sorts of cravings. And that training in some way started
00:09:33.320
at Stanford in the late 90s when I got into philosophy and then became a philosophy professor
00:09:39.240
and then really interested in practices like meditation and yoga where the whole purpose
00:09:45.800
is to cultivate the skill of focused attention and learn how to use one's own mind more
00:09:52.680
skillfully. So, here I was waking up every day, meditating, and yet still captured by these cravings.
00:10:03.400
In some ways, what led me to take this question really seriously around,
00:10:08.840
this might just be the problem of our time. And I think it's the problem of our time,
00:10:14.920
both because it's ubiquitous and because it's so invisible. It's happening beneath the radar of
00:10:21.720
awareness in such a way where we can't even see that it's going on for the most part.
00:10:28.120
So, in terms of my own screen addiction, there's all these hacks out there. I've used many of those,
00:10:34.680
right? Like redesign your environment, kick your phones out of your bedroom. There's even
00:10:39.800
self-binding techniques where you can lock your phone in a safe that doesn't open until it's
00:10:45.640
like two hours or three hours, whatever you specify. But one of the more interesting tactics I use,
00:10:51.400
that was actually quite interesting and helped me understand the root of the addiction.
00:10:56.360
It came from the tradition of tantric Buddhism where they have what's often called feast practice.
00:11:02.040
And it's a practice where instead of practicing restraint or aestheticism, you're practicing
00:11:09.320
indulgence, conscious indulgence. So, you know, in the traditions, it's often used with sex and
00:11:15.000
decadent eating and drinking. But I thought, wouldn't it be interesting to use this with screens?
00:11:20.680
And so, I spent three days all day, every day just gorging on digital outrage and Instagram and news,
00:11:32.200
and just all the things that I normally see as like my favorite mind snacks. And what was really
00:11:38.360
interesting about that is in a way, it actually worked because after those three days,
00:11:42.440
I remember I woke up and I had the thought, this is when I would usually grab my phone,
00:11:48.280
and the desire just totally fell flat. And what I realized in that moment is that
00:11:53.560
at least for most of us, I think the root of this addiction is an addiction to novelty,
00:11:59.400
that we pick up our device because it offers what technologists call a variable reward, that there's
00:12:06.040
something new that we're going to see in our texts or our email or a new news feed or a new
00:12:12.120
social media feed and by going all the way with my phone for such a long period of time,
00:12:18.840
in a way I had annihilated its superpower, its superpower of novelty.
00:12:23.000
Well, that is only part of the journey that you undertook, right?
00:12:29.720
That's true. Yes. It wasn't enough just to gorg and feel a sense of satiation.
00:12:38.760
It was necessary then to take the next step, which is disconnection and finding yourself
00:12:47.560
essentially alone in a room where instead of staring at a screen,
00:12:55.560
one is staring at a void if you want to put it away. Here, I was quite interested in the
00:13:02.760
experiment that you referred to. I don't remember who it is. Timothy Wilson from University of
00:13:07.400
Virginia. Yeah. Can you say a word about that experiment? Because I found that extremely enlightening
00:13:12.680
revelatory or insightful is the right word, I guess. Yeah. I'm glad you brought that up because
00:13:17.960
I think of screens as creating a behavioral addiction. So it's different from other forms of
00:13:27.000
addiction, substance abuse addiction, things like that, but similar to something like gambling or
00:13:32.360
shopping addiction. It's happening at the level of behavior. And one of the best ways to understand
00:13:39.320
the reason for a behavioral addiction like that is that often that behavior is coming out of a
00:13:46.840
desire to escape from some sort of unresolved emotional experience, difficult emotions, scary
00:13:54.360
thoughts, traumas that we might have experienced. And so there's this subtle aversion that I think
00:13:59.800
many of us have to our own mind to just sitting there in silence with our own mind. And that's
00:14:04.600
what Timothy Wilson's team did in an experiment is they essentially revealed the ways in which
00:14:10.920
for many of us, we live with this constant aversion to our own thinking. And so what they did is
00:14:19.880
they put people in a room for 15 minutes, and they called it the 15 minute thinking period,
00:14:25.000
people had to put away all their belongings, including their phone, so they didn't have their
00:14:28.360
phone with them. And at first, they just had them go into this room and 50% of people said, wow,
00:14:33.880
that was really unpleasant. You know, even though in our busy chaotic lives, like 15 minutes,
00:14:40.520
just to sit there and not have to do anything, that sounds fantastic. Like who wouldn't want that?
00:14:44.120
But then they shifted the experiment. And here's where I think it gets really interesting.
00:14:49.320
They had people go in for 15 minutes again with nothing. Just do your 15 minute thinking period.
00:14:55.320
But this time they gave them a choice. You can either sit there with your thoughts, or they attached
00:15:01.320
two electrodes to their ankle and train them on how to self administer a high voltage shock to
00:15:07.160
themselves. So another question became, would people just sort of sit there, relax with their thoughts,
00:15:13.640
or would that be so aversive that they'd rather torture themselves using a high voltage shock?
00:15:18.200
And it turned out 27% of women shocked themselves, 67% of men shocked themselves. And there was one
00:15:24.840
guy, apparently, who shocked himself 190 times in 15 minutes. And the conclusion of this,
00:15:31.960
which I think is really fascinating, is that there is something about idle time that,
00:15:38.280
especially now that we're so conditioned with these phones and all the distractions we're
00:15:42.840
surrounded by constantly, that's so aversive to us. We'd rather torture ourselves
00:15:47.800
than just be there with our own minds. And the way that you talked about with Plato,
00:15:51.800
right, like sitting in the silence of our own mind and allowing that deeper form of thought to
00:15:56.360
arise. That is in a way, an aversion of the modern mind.
00:15:59.480
Well, you've studied philosophy and it becomes a philosophical question, which is, what are the
00:16:09.000
deeper sources of this aversion? And I couldn't help thinking of the 17th century French philosopher,
00:16:18.520
we want to call blaze Pascal, a philosopher, but Pascal famous for his ponces or his thoughts,
00:16:26.520
has very interesting things to say about the human need for diversion. Here, now we're talking
00:16:35.080
about something more universal than our own distracted age in our present moment in history,
00:16:41.320
because according to Pascal, I'll quote a few of his ponces, starting with this one, for example,
00:16:47.400
nothing is so insufferable to man as to be completely at rest without passions, without business,
00:16:53.000
without diversion, without study. He then feels his nothingness, his forlornness, his insufficiency,
00:17:00.440
his dependence, his weakness, his emptiness. There will immediately arise from the depth of his
00:17:06.440
heart, weariness, gloom, sadness, fretfulness, fixation, despair. And it's always like,
00:17:12.200
you would rather have a shock, no, even a hundred times, yeah. And then it goes on to
00:17:17.320
say I have discovered that all the unhappiness of men arises from one single fact that they
00:17:22.200
cannot stay quietly in their own room. A man who has enough to live on if he knew how to stay with
00:17:28.360
pleasure at home would not leave to go to sea or beseech a town, a commission in the army would
00:17:33.560
not be bought so dearly, but that it is found insufferable not to budge from the town, and men
00:17:39.320
only seek conversation to enter in games because they cannot remain at peace at home.
00:17:45.000
So there is here a more existential suggestion that when we are left without any diversion,
00:17:53.800
we start thinking of the emptiness of our own condition and inevitably towards our mortality
00:18:01.960
and death, and that therefore this is what existentialists would call the flight from this sort of
00:18:10.600
genuine or authentic awareness of one's own abandonment by being. Anyway, I don't want to get too
00:18:16.760
heavy on the existentialist thing, but it seems to me that social media and other forms of screen
00:18:23.800
addiction would not have nearly the amount of crushing success that it has in our time,
00:18:29.240
if it were not actually feeding off of or profiting from this dread or what Kiphegard called
00:18:39.720
the anxiety that attends the human condition in general.
00:18:43.160
I think you're right, and I love the Pascal and the Kiphegard.
00:18:48.840
I think what you're saying is exactly true that there is this deep existential dread
00:18:57.240
that when we really sink down to the recesses of our mind, we encounter, and this is why
00:19:04.200
if you've ever done like a silent meditation retreat for a week or 10 days,
00:19:09.720
I love those and a weird masochistic way, but this is one of the main things that
00:19:14.680
one experiences is that for a couple of days it feels great to be off the grid.
00:19:19.560
It's amazing not to have emails you have to worry about and distraction.
00:19:23.640
And then all of a sudden the mind just starts to reveal all of this content that you might not
00:19:32.520
have thought of for years, traumatic memories, really hard emotions.
00:19:38.280
I think that's exactly right that it is maybe baked into human nature
00:19:43.640
that being with our own mind is counter habitual.
00:19:47.000
It's not what we're wired to do, but there's that existential dread baked into it.
00:19:53.480
And yet I also think that what's going on or what has happened over the last 15 or so years
00:20:00.760
since the advent of the smartphone in 2007 is that we now have a way of exiting from those encounters
00:20:09.320
with our own mind so quickly, so reliably, so constantly that it's almost as though we're closing
00:20:17.000
down on steroids. You know, we've always been doing it and in the book I quote, "Tokeville,"
00:20:22.040
one of my other favorite French philosophers who talks about how Americans are turning inward
00:20:28.600
and seeking pleasure and there's this closing happening which I think is very similar to what we're
00:20:33.400
experiencing today, but I guess the tools we have now are just so much more powerful and
00:20:40.600
carefully meticulously designed by the world's leading technologists and artificial intelligence
00:20:45.960
algorithms specifically so that they can exploit these weaknesses of our brain.
00:20:50.440
So that's what I think is so fascinating about our current times that we're doing with
00:20:56.200
age-old existential content, but the tools that are being used to draw us into these worlds of
00:21:03.320
Greenland are just so much more sophisticated than anything Pascal or Tokeville could even conceive.
00:21:09.720
Exactly. And your experience and maybe you could tell us a little bit about the sort of discipline
00:21:18.200
that is required in order to not just disconnect from the Borg Collective as I would call it where
00:21:29.320
we're always plugged into the Beehive Collective and you're always hearing all the
00:21:35.960
collective's voice always in your head, so you're never allowed to hear your own thoughts.
00:21:42.440
So disconnecting from the Collective is one thing, but then it takes I gather from what you write about
00:21:50.600
your own personal experience, a rather diligent discipline sort of commitment to go from the
00:21:58.440
close mind to an open expansive mind. It's not just a question of curing yourself from an
00:22:05.960
addiction, it's about cultivating some new possibilities on the other side of the addiction.
00:22:12.200
I think that's right. It reminds me of this idea that freedom often requires some form of constraint.
00:22:20.040
I remember we're so talking about this and this is back in my political philosophy,
00:22:25.320
Professor Days, but I think that's true here as well, that if we just give ourselves total freedom
00:22:33.560
to binge on our screens and addictive technologies and political outrage and all these kind of quick
00:22:39.560
dopamine hits that are available to us. In one sense we're free, but the value of that freedom feels
00:22:46.760
pretty limited. It actually feels like we're closing off a lot of possibilities that might be
00:22:53.240
available to us. So if we want to experience an alternative to that Beehive mind that you're
00:23:01.240
describing, and by the way, I think the distinction you were making in the opening was so important
00:23:06.600
and beautiful. I was interpreting it as a distinction between our deepest authentic layer of thought
00:23:13.560
or something like intuition and what's usually happening, which I would call mind wandering. That's
00:23:21.640
the technical term in psychology of just like this super fast paced random thoughts about stuff
00:23:29.320
you got to do or like something you saw on social media or whatever, that there is that
00:23:34.600
essential distinction between those two and to spend more time in that more authentic zone of intuition,
00:23:41.480
sometimes I think we do have to create some constraints. Anna Lemke, one of your colleagues at
00:23:48.200
Stanford, she wrote a book called Dopamine Nation, which I thought was really interesting where
00:23:51.800
she argues that this self binding approach is really one of the keys to overcoming any form of
00:23:58.920
addiction, including an addiction to screens. So she actually goes so far as to say,
00:24:03.320
go without whatever it is that causes your craving for a month and then reevaluate your relationship
00:24:09.400
with that thing. So I think those kinds of things are really powerful and there's a lot of ways
00:24:13.880
we can do it. Meditation is a practice we can use for that simply binding ourselves such that
00:24:19.880
we don't have access to this kind of content or devices is a powerful way to do it. But I think
00:24:25.720
you're right that it does require discipline to create that freedom. So in part two, you have these
00:24:31.400
rubrics for sections. You talk about psychedelic opening, happy land opening to the enemy, open
00:24:40.040
meditation street opening, and you actually underwent a number of behavioral changes. So I mean,
00:24:46.600
just opening to the enemy, you join, you modify your arm, you went to fire ranges, you talk to
00:24:54.200
people from the NR, did you join the NRA or? No, so yeah, yeah. So just to be clear, I did not buy a
00:24:59.480
firearm. And the context here is I live in Boulder, a very liberal enclave. I'm a proponent of gun
00:25:06.760
control. I go in this terrifying me. So I didn't buy a firearm, but what I did do is I underwent a
00:25:13.960
national rifle association training and I got my concealed carry permit in the state of Colorado.
00:25:19.880
So it was an attempt for me to really explore in a first-hand experiential way. What is it
00:25:27.400
like to really open to the other side? So I ended up going to rural Colorado and doing this
00:25:33.960
this sort of full immersion experience in gun culture and some pretty far out politics.
00:25:40.760
But in the end, it was a really valuable experience. I mean, I think my main takeaway was that
00:25:47.560
there is no enemy here. I mean, these, these people were just like me in so many ways. I could see
00:25:53.160
the humanity behind all of it. And yeah, we disagree, but there's something deeper there that connects us.
00:25:58.520
Yeah, we have so much more in common with any fellow human being than we have in terms of differences.
00:26:03.800
And the enemy is more often than not or only rarely is the devil. The devil that we make the
00:26:12.120
enemy in our own imaginations, no demonization or that. So you opened yourself in that regard. You
00:26:19.160
also had not done drugs and that you also opened your mind to psychedelic experiences, right?
00:26:26.840
Yeah, that was a really interesting thing. I wasn't planning to do that. That was not at all part of
00:26:33.400
the original project as I laid this out. But I realized that there were so many amazing breakthroughs
00:26:41.000
in the field of psychedelic science happening that it would be very difficult to write or explore
00:26:47.560
this idea of opening without encountering this for myself. And just one quick anecdote from that.
00:26:55.000
So what I experienced was what I would call psychedelic-assisted therapy. I had a therapist,
00:27:02.440
I had a very extensive psychological evaluation before doing any of this. So this was very
00:27:07.480
structured, very purposeful, very controlled. It wasn't just me in the backyard, like doing
00:27:12.920
a much of LSD or something. And what I experienced that was quite amazing is I had had this
00:27:19.000
fear of flying for about 20 years. And during one of these psychedelic-assisted therapy sessions
00:27:25.080
on the compound ketamine with my therapist right next to me, I had this experience of actually
00:27:30.440
being on a flight. And for the first time in 20 years, it was totally calm and there's nowhere
00:27:36.520
I'd rather be. And then I actually watched myself die in a commercial plane crash. It was like
00:27:43.400
the plane was going down and I saw the plane explode into a big fireball. And I watched myself
00:27:49.160
incinerated. It was like one of the more beautiful things I had ever seen.
00:27:53.560
Was that an out of body experience? Well, it was kind of just like this
00:27:56.920
total inversion of perspective, I guess is how I would describe it. And what was most amazing
00:28:02.520
about it is that it's not that my fear of flying has totally disappeared, but it has changed
00:28:08.600
in remarkable ways. I used to have dreams like this. Those dreams have gone away. When I'm on a flight
00:28:14.920
now and I feel some anxiety, I immediately see myself on this, I call it the ketamine express,
00:28:20.680
this sort of magical plane. And so what I realized is that to your point about existentialism
00:28:26.920
earlier, I think for some of us who have experienced trauma in the past, there are corners of the
00:28:31.960
mind that are almost impossible to encounter in our ordinary state of consciousness. And that
00:28:38.760
this new emerging practice of psychedelic assisted therapy, it gives us a way of opening to some of
00:28:45.560
these darkest corners of the mind and completely transforming our relationship to those places.
00:28:52.120
And so that I think is the promise of all this. And obviously there's a lot of dangers. There's a
00:28:56.360
lot of risks. There's a lot we need to learn about the science of it. But I think it's a really
00:29:01.000
powerful possibility. Yeah. Well, how about meditation? That is something that I'm curious about because
00:29:11.480
I've never been particularly seduced by the idea of anjomy to some sort of discipline meditative
00:29:20.440
practice. But many of my friends do meditate and they seem to have been enriched immeasurably
00:29:30.680
through it. And it philosophically, it seems to me the perfect sort of recipe for any kind of same
00:29:38.680
existence. But I don't know what it is in me that resists it. Maybe it's just my western,
00:29:44.600
logo-centric sort of disposition where I feel like I should always be in some kind of
00:29:49.960
dialogical relation to others, whether it's in actual conversation as we do one in title opinions
00:29:56.680
as we're doing right now where there's a kind of exchange of ideas or whether it's in
00:30:04.120
conversation with the dead in terms of reading books that come to us from the past.
00:30:11.480
But can you say something about your incorporation of meditation into this project of going from
00:30:19.320
a close to an open mind? Yeah. And it's interesting. I hear that perspective a lot about meditation.
00:30:27.560
And it's certainly not something that's for everyone. So I'm not one of those people who says,
00:30:31.640
"Oh, I've reached meditate." I think of meditation at its best as almost being like a conversation
00:30:39.080
with the present moment that what we're cultivating in our mind is the ability to
00:30:45.000
stay with something that's occurring in present time. So sometimes when you're meditating,
00:30:50.520
you'll concentrate on the sensations of breath. Breath is always happening now, right? It's
00:30:55.320
never happening yesterday. So that's one way of doing it. In the book though, and just in my own
00:31:01.720
experience, I've been exploring sort of two sides of meditation. One is what I would think of as a
00:31:08.840
more formal practice where you're sitting down for 30 minutes or 10 minutes or 20 minutes
00:31:14.600
or going to retreat and you're trying to block out distraction. I think that's really powerful.
00:31:20.520
That's something I do. But I also think that can be a barrier for certain people,
00:31:25.560
maybe you fall in this camp. And so there's this other practice that I've come to call
00:31:31.720
street meditation or street opening, which in some ways is like the real practice. And I think
00:31:36.920
the more exciting practice. And that's just the idea of when you're standing in line at the grocery
00:31:42.520
store or actually just earlier this week, we were driving down from the mountains, we were skiing
00:31:49.160
here in Colorado. We got caught in like a four hour traffic jam, you know, just sitting there and I
00:31:54.440
realized I could sit here in agony or I could meditate. And so the idea is like, can you bring this
00:32:02.120
practice of just really turning toward whatever it is that's happening in the present moment,
00:32:07.800
the sounds, the sights, the sensations, your breath and see if you can do that,
00:32:13.640
even in the kind of crazy, weird circumstances of modern life, you know, at Costco,
00:32:19.480
when you're at the airport standing in the long security line or whatever it is.
00:32:24.200
So I think for people who are like turned off by the formal practice, that can be a better on ramp.
00:32:31.080
And again, the goal I think is really to have that conversation with wow, what's actually happening
00:32:35.560
in present time? If I get out of this time traveling mental space and just into like,
00:32:40.280
what's happening here now?
00:32:42.280
So you would describe it not as a certain transcend of flight from reality, but actually an
00:32:49.880
altered sort of encounter with the real. It's almost yeah, an encounter with the pre-conceptual
00:32:55.720
nature of each moment, whereas a lot of thought for me is very conceptual and it's very story-based.
00:33:02.680
It's almost like what's happening below the story. And sometimes for me, that's a really
00:33:08.840
liberating place to be because the stories can be unnerving and distracting and terrifying at
00:33:16.040
times.
00:33:16.440
Yeah. That's very interesting because you obviously undertook very deliberate way this sort of
00:33:24.200
expansion and I take it from your book that not only was it worth it, but it's something that you
00:33:29.800
feel strongly enough to have written a whole book which invites your reader to
00:33:36.200
actually not just follow your example. That wouldn't be the right way of putting it, but
00:33:43.480
seriously considering a very substantial alteration of mind in our own
00:33:52.040
distracted world as you put it.
00:33:53.560
Yeah. I mean, I think of this as something that our world could really use in the sense that
00:34:01.960
it just feels like life is moving faster, politics are becoming increasingly divisive,
00:34:10.040
distractions are becoming more powerful, they have more of a hold on us, and that if we're going
00:34:17.400
to survive in this increasingly uncertain, strange time, that openness might be one of the key
00:34:26.040
virtues that enable us to survive and even thrive in these times where everything seems
00:34:32.360
so just sort of radically contingent and wild and chaotic.
00:34:37.880
Yeah. I have one more issue that I'd like to raise with you, which is the role of nature,
00:34:43.000
because what I find oppressive about screen addiction, I mean, I'm not a screen addict myself,
00:34:49.400
but I do spend a lot of time, I have to spend a lot of time on screen because I, you know,
00:34:55.240
writing is something that takes place on the screen now, communication emails and so forth.
00:35:00.120
But what I find so impoverished about this screen is the other of the screen for me is the
00:35:06.600
natural world is nature itself and nature is where I find that the most significant, deep thinking
00:35:15.800
takes place, at least for me, maybe because I have a particular sort of bond with the natural
00:35:24.040
world that I've had since I was kid or for other reasons, but do you think that nature is an
00:35:32.440
essential ingredient to the expansion of the mind? You know, as you're asking me that, I had this thought,
00:35:40.040
that might have been a miss for me. I should have, should have emphasized nature a little bit more,
00:35:46.040
because you were describing that. I was thinking about this essay, Thoreau wrote called,
00:35:50.600
"Balking," where he talks about his practice of walking for four hours a day, and he makes this
00:35:56.680
amazing point of like, when we're in nature we experience wildness, and it's that wildness that
00:36:03.560
allows us that unsettles our conventional forms of thinking. And so encountering wildness,
00:36:09.720
you're right. I mean, that's like an essential ingredient to having a more open experience and a
00:36:16.760
more open mind. And boy, if I had to do over, I might say more about that.
00:36:21.320
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
00:36:22.760
But I appreciate you bringing that up. And it's funny, even in this period where this is a really
00:36:27.800
intense period in my life, because anytime there's a new book, there's a lot of energy and a lot of
00:36:33.880
stress. And I've been trying to create an intentional practice of going outside every day for an hour to,
00:36:41.000
I live by the mountains here in Colorado. And just as you're saying, for me, it is such a
00:36:47.400
grounding experience. Yeah. You know, there's everything's moving a little bit more slowly.
00:36:52.920
It's in present time versus the past or the future.
00:36:55.480
Well, Nate, there's no reason why you can't do a follow up on the, you know, having nature at the
00:37:01.640
heart of your ongoing expansion of mind. I think that would be the next place I would go.
00:37:07.400
Well, yeah, thank you so much. I mean, I just have to say it's such an honor to be here. You
00:37:14.760
have interviewed many of my philosophical heroes, Richard Rorty. We talked about that a little bit. He's
00:37:19.640
it was one of my advisors. And just to be on this show is to me a real honor. So thank you.
00:37:25.800
Well, thank you. It's having people like you, you know, thoughtful people like you that makes
00:37:30.920
the show what it is. So I'd like to thank Nate Klempe for joining us here on entitled opinions
00:37:36.920
to discuss his brand new book called Open Living with an Expensive Mind in a Distracted World.
00:37:43.240
Thanks again for coming on, Nate. I'm Robert Harrison for entitled opinions. Thanks for listening.
00:37:55.480
[Music]
00:38:05.480
[Music]
00:38:15.480
[Music]
00:38:25.480
[Music]
00:38:35.480
[Music]
00:38:45.480
[Music]
00:38:55.480
[Music]
00:39:05.480
[Music]
00:39:15.480
[Music]
00:39:25.480
[Music]
00:39:35.480
[Music]